20 Mar 2008
LAM HING CHOI v. YIP KING ON AND OTHERS
- Citation
- LAM HING CHOI v. YIP KING ON AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCPI263/2006
The court preferred the plaintiff's medical evidence (Dr Au) and accepted the plaintiff's wage evidence on balance of probabilities because the defence produced no witness to explain inconsistent employer documents; accordingly the plaintiff was entitled to damages for PSLA and quantified past and future losses as calculated, resulting in judgment for the plaintiff for $1,952,705 plus interest and costs.