19 Nov 2013
HKSAR v. NG CHUN TO RAYMOND AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. NG CHUN TO RAYMOND AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC178/2010
Given the gravity, scale and sophistication of the warrant‑pushing scheme, the substantial sums involved, the strength of the circumstantial evidence and the plausible lead role of D1, the interests of justice required a retrial of D1 on Charges 1‑4; by contrast retrial of D4 was refused because she had served her sentence (with remission), the delay and prejudice of re‑trial would be oppressive and confiscation issues could be addressed without a new conviction for property in her possession under s102 CPO.