2 Dec 1999
BRISILVER INVESTMENT LTD. v. WONG FAT TSO AND ANOTHER and LIGHT TIME INVESTMENTS LTD. (Intervener)
- Citation
- BRISILVER INVESTMENT LTD. v. WONG FAT TSO AND ANOTHER and LIGHT TIME INVESTMENTS LTD. (Intervener)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV251/1999
The subpoena was properly set aside because it constituted an impermissible discovery/fishing exercise from a non‑party; the planning documents were speculative, not demonstrably relevant or necessary to the issues before the court (primarily whether to order sale), and there was no justification to pierce the corporate veil; therefore the Judge below correctly refused the subpoena and the appeal was dismissed.