21 Nov 2014
UOB KAY HIAN FUTURES (HONG KONG) LTD v. LAI, LAWRENCE AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- UOB KAY HIAN FUTURES (HONG KONG) LTD v. LAI, LAWRENCE AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1946/2011
The summons for specific discovery is dismissed because the applicant failed to comply with Order 24 rule 7 evidential requirements (no adequate affidavit establishing existence, possession, relevancy and necessity), compounded by procedural default (failure to file a reply affirmation and joint progress report), and even on the merits the 2010 Document and ad hoc Horn Applications rendered the sought document unnecessary for fair disposal.