30 Jun 2015
黃坤平 對 張素芬
- Citation
- 黃坤平 對 張素芬
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1716/2011
On the balance of probabilities the plaintiff failed to prove continuous and uninterrupted adverse possession for the required 12 years because material interruptions and periods of non‑use are shown by maps, correspondence, electricity records and witness evidence (notably interruptions around 2004–2006, 2007–2008 and 2010–2011); consequently plaintiff did not acquire title by adverse possession and his claim is dismissed.