12 Feb 2003
HKSAR v. CHENG HAY YIM
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHENG HAY YIM
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC369/2002
Admitted evidence that the charged stampers contained counterfeit works and could be used to make infringing copies, together with the applicant's implausible interview and failure to make inquiries, meant he did not discharge the onus under s.118(5) to show lack of knowledge or reason to believe; export to Brazil or asserted testing use did not avoid liability under s.118(4).