24 Jul 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 陸效祥
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 2018
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA372/2023
The appellate court, on re-hearing of all evidence and exhibits including scene photos and the tools recovered, concluded the trial judge's adverse credibility findings were justified and the only irresistible inference was that the appellant jointly participated in stealing the vehicle battery and possessed tools for that purpose; accordingly convictions and concurrent sentences of five months' imprisonment were upheld.