6 Dec 2021
香港特別行政區 訴 雷启添
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 3495
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA159/2021
The trial judge rationally rejected the appellant's work‑use explanation, accepted expert evidence that the laser pen could injure eyes at up to 40 metres, and found the appellant's appearance at protest sites with the pen and other items demonstrated preparedness to use it as a weapon; those findings supported conviction under Public Order Ordinance s33(1) and (2) and warranted dismissal of the appeal.