25 May 1993
THE QUEEN v. SO CHI WING AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. SO CHI WING AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA263/1993
For D2 the magistrate's rejection of PW1's evidence about the location of the goods (and the admission that the photographs were taken later) undermined the prosecution case and created a lurking doubt about knowledge and intent, requiring allowance of the appeal. For D3 the unreliability and discrepancies in PW2's evidence about events and the taking of the cautioned statement made it unsafe to base a conviction solely on that statement, requiring allowance of the appeal.