20 Mar 1997
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. SHIMIZU CORPORATION
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. SHIMIZU CORPORATION
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV186/1996
Leave to appeal was refused because the matter must be remitted to the Arbitrator under s23(2)(b) making it indistinguishable from related appeals, and because the recently enacted Arbitration Ordinance explicitly provides for compound interest such that the high threshold for granting leave under Rule 2(b) is not met.