30 Apr 2014
HOWARD ROBERT BALLOCH AND ANOTHER v. ING YIM LEUNG ALEXANDER ALSO KNOWN AS ALEX ING
- Citation
- HOWARD ROBERT BALLOCH AND ANOTHER v. ING YIM LEUNG ALEXANDER ALSO KNOWN AS ALEX ING
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1556/2013
Summary judgment under Order 14 was refused because the scope of the indemnity and the existence and effect of the reasonableness/pre-approval conditions raised serious material factual disputes requiring oral evidence and cross-examination; security for costs under Order 23 was refused because the plaintiffs, though resident abroad, were prominent individuals with an even chance of success and there was no sufficient risk they would not honour costs orders; accordingly both interlocutory applications were dismissed and each party ordered to bear their own costs.