28 Mar 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 姚紅菊
- Citation
- [2024] HKCA 308
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC166/2022
Although the trial judge erred in treating an admission of trafficking as automatically precluding consideration of a claim that a significant portion was for personal use, the appellant produced insufficient evidence and did not testify or quantify any personal-use portion; on the correct application of precedent the facts do not justify any reduction, so the appeal against sentence is dismissed and the original sentence is upheld.