18 Jun 2024
CHU YEUT LIN AND ANOTHER v. EVERBRIGHT GROUPS LTD
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 1626
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA9/2024
Leave to appeal was refused because section 30 confers a broad discretionary power to order security which is not limited to cases of abuse or undue delay; the Tribunal was entitled to take a preliminary view of the merits and properly found that the Employer had caused delay by failing to provide required documents and particulars, and there was no arguable error of law that would justify leave to appeal.