5 Jun 1986
THE QUEEN v. HO SAI KUEN (D1) AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. HO SAI KUEN (D1) AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC471/1985
The appeal by the 3rd Defendant was refused because the statutory presumption from possession of keys and drugs supported the jury verdict, the Judge's warnings cured incidental prejudicial references and precedent (Yu Tit Hoi) correctly precluded cross-examination on the unadmitted statement; however the sentence imposed on the 2nd Defendant was varied because the sentencing Judge failed to demonstrate proper consideration of the statutory requirements for offenders aged 16–20 under s.109A(1).