30 Jan 2007
HKSAR v. NG CHUN KEUNG
- Citation
- HKSAR v. NG CHUN KEUNG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC295/2005
Verdicts were not inconsistent because a reasonable jury could infer knowledge of firearms from admissions and visibility while not being sure of concealed grenades; separate counts under Cap.238 and Cap.200 were lawful because possession of distinct items in the same container can amount to separate acts of possession and s58 does not bar charging both where distinct acts/items are alleged; identification evidence was for the jury and was properly directed under Turnbull; sentencing error required correction because consecutive treatment produced totals exceeding the statutory maximum so the…