28 Nov 2025
有關覃錫鴻的事宜
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 5856
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCB6136/2025
The court found the statutory demand rooted in a valid costs order which constitutes prima facie evidence of the debt; the debtor failed to satisfy the higher evidentiary burden to show a substantive defence or real prospect of success on appeal, provided no credible reason for delay for leave to appeal, and advanced baseless allegations of judicial impropriety; accordingly the petitioners were entitled to the usual bankruptcy order under s.6A(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Ordinance.