1 Sept 2025
POOSAALA RAM PRASAD v. THE HONG KONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LTD
- Citation
- [2025] HKCA 789
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV466/2021
The Decision was final and not interlocutory, so leave to appeal was not required; alternatively, even if leave were required, the appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success or any other reason in the interests of justice to hear the appeal; the taxing master's exercise of discretion on undue delay and printing charges was not plainly wrong and the costs awarded to the respondent (HK$80,000) were appropriate.