21 Mar 2023
王 對 陳
- Citation
- [2023] HKCA 372
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAMP213/2022
The Court refused leave on all four summonses because the respondent failed to identify any legal, factual or discretionary errors by the three judges, most applications were grossly out of time without satisfactory explanation, the asserted grounds were incoherent and lacked any real prospect of success, and the interim/case-management orders had been overtaken by the final judgment; accordingly leave was refused and costs were ordered, with assessment by paper procedure and no oral hearing permitted under Order 59A(8).