28 Nov 2017
RANA NETRA KUMARI v. CHINA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- RANA NETRA KUMARI v. CHINA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEC1951/2015
Ghale's witness statement was admitted because, as the applicant's direct supervisor, his evidence about the site, the scope of the applicant's duties and the location of the alleged accident was highly probative and necessary for trial; Madam Yu's statement was disallowed because it lacked probative value, did not exhibit contractual terms and was redundant in light of Ghale's evidence; the court exercised case management over expert evidence by directing a joint supplemental report and apportioned costs to reflect partial success and failure of the parties on the witness statement applicati…