3 Mar 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Judge’s refusal of leave; the applicant breached Practice Direction 4.1 and was properly debarred; the Board’s adverse credibility and internal relocation findings were open on the evidence and do not warrant interference.
10 Dec 2021
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484, raised no ground that was reasonably arguable, and there was no basis under the 'otherwise' limb; procedural non‑compliance justified dealing with the application on the papers and debarment from further written submissions.
29 Oct 2021
The Court refused leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal because the question advanced was not one of great general or public importance under s.22(b) Cap 484, was not reasonably arguable, and the applicant failed to identify any error in the Court of Appeal's reasons with sufficient particularity; filings made without leave were properly excluded pursuant to the Registrar's directions; consequently the Notice of Motion and subsequent motions and petitions were dismissed and costs awarded to the putative respondent.
13 Sept 2017
The Court refused leave because the applicant failed to identify any issue of great and general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap.484 and the matters appealed were case‑specific determinations about security for costs governed by established authority (Chung Kau), so there was no proper basis to refer the matter to the Court of Final Appeal.
13 Jun 2011
The proposed appeal was dismissed because the Notice of Application combined with the applicant's subsequently served first batch of evidence sufficiently informed the respondent of the nature and basis of the case; the Notice of Application is not a formal pleading requiring minute factual detail, and the proposed appeal had no reasonable prospect of success and was totally devoid of merit.