9 Jun 2005
HKSAR v. LEE HOI CHEONG
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LEE HOI CHEONG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC379/2004
The trial judge’s acceptance of PW1 and PW2 evidence, combined with the trial judge’s permissible drawing of irresistible inferences from surrounding facts and circumstances (including the female voice instructing to flush and observed movements), provided sufficient and reliable evidence to uphold convictions; cautioned statements were properly admitted as voluntary but were not relied upon for conviction; therefore leave to appeal was refused.