13 Feb 2007
PETER PO FUN CHAN v. WINNIE C W CHEUNG AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- PETER PO FUN CHAN v. WINNIE C W CHEUNG AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV232/2006
Extension of time was refused because no valid explanation for the delay was shown and the matter had been handled without dispatch and improperly presented; even if time had been extended, leave under s22(1)(b) would have been refused because the points raised either exceeded the matters argued on appeal or did not meet the threshold of great or general public importance and the application was only a preliminary sieving step.