13 Jan 2006
HO HON CHUNG DANEL v. HKSAR
- Citation
- HO HON CHUNG DANEL v. HKSAR
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMC77/2005
Leave to appeal was refused because the re-trial did not constitute an abuse of process attributable solely to the prosecution (defence counsel shared responsibility for appellate error), and there was ample evidence to justify the judge's inference of absence of consent (physical characteristics of discs, expert witness evidence and the finding that the purported authorization was bogus), so no substantial and grave injustice was shown.