6 May 1992
R. v. LAM PING-KEUNG
- Citation
- R. v. LAM PING-KEUNG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC415/1991
Appeal allowed only in respect of charge 1 because PW2's age was not proved; all other convictions (charges 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7) and concurrent sentences were affirmed because the statutory wording of s.141 bears its plain meaning and there was ample evidence (admissions, paraphernalia, key, payment pattern and PW3's certified age) to support findings of management and living on the earnings of prostitution.