14 Aug 2009
HKSAR v. LI, SUI FONG
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LI, SUI FONG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA37/2009
The appeal is allowed because the evidence demonstrated two concurrent uses (residential and massage) and the prosecution failed to prove that the prohibited prostitution-related use was the main use of the premises, leaving a reasonable doubt as to an essential element of the offence.