2 Apr 2012
KIM LUNG TRANSPORTATION CO (a firm) AND OTHERS v. IP MAN FAI AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- KIM LUNG TRANSPORTATION CO (a firm) AND OTHERS v. IP MAN FAI AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA271/2012
The Anton Piller order was discharged because the plaintiffs materially non-disclosed the 6th plaintiff's involvement in competing air‑freight businesses (Skytrans Express and East Express), facts that were critical to assessing both the likelihood of destruction of evidence and the proportionality of the order; that non-disclosure justified setting aside the ex parte order and no re‑granting was appropriate on the evidence before the court.