21 Nov 2024
HUANG CAIYUN v. LIN JINGJING
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3358
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1012/2024
Prayer 1 is not plainly and obviously a proprietary claim because it can be read as a personal contractual claim quantified by reference to the JB Account and therefore discloses a reasonable cause of action; prayer 2 is plainly unsustainable because the unjust enrichment claim pleads enrichment of HK$10,500,000 with no pleaded connection to the JB Account, so prayer 2 discloses no reasonable cause of action and must be struck out; costs orders adjusted accordingly.