12 Dec 2006
HKSAR v. TING JAMES HENRY
- Citation
- HKSAR v. TING JAMES HENRY
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC318/2005
The court refused certification because the questions raised involved the application of established legal principles to the facts of the case rather than points of law of great and general importance; it held that a retrial was properly ordered under section 83E as being in the interests of justice and not simply to give the prosecution a second chance, and denied trial costs to the applicant because his conduct (fabrication of transaction and documents) brought grave suspicion upon him though appeal costs were awarded.