18 Dec 2025
The applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under section 22(1)(b) HKCFAO and failed to demonstrate any error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision; her assertions were vague and unsupported; therefore leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused and the Notice of Motion dismissed.
14 Feb 2025
The Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) HKCFAO, failed to identify any specific error in the Court's prior judgment, and relied on vague, unsupported, fact-specific assertions amounting to an improper re‑argument of matters already decided; accordingly leave to appeal was refused.
17 Jan 2024
The Notice of Motion for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) HKCFAO and his assertions were vague, unsupported and merely re‑ran earlier rejected arguments, thereby providing no basis for leave.
15 Aug 2019
The applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under section 22(1)(b) HKCFAO and his submissions were non‑specific and largely pro forma; there was no basis under the 'or otherwise' limb to grant leave, therefore the motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was dismissed.