4 Jun 2014
ARIMA PHOTOVOLTAIC & OPTICAL CORPORATION v. FLEXTRONICS COMPUTING SALES AND MARKETING (L) LTD
- Citation
- ARIMA PHOTOVOLTAIC & OPTICAL CORPORATION v. FLEXTRONICS COMPUTING SALES AND MARKETING (L) LTD
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV194/2012
Paragraph 255 of the award was an adequate reason for the quantum of Counterclaim E in the context of the arbitration because the plaintiff did not adduce contrary evidence, cross-examine on quantum or make submissions challenging the amount; therefore there was no failure to give reasons and the Article 34(2) Model Law grounds were not engaged; appeal dismissed and indemnity costs awarded to the respondent.