8 Oct 2025
RE TRAN DINH NAM
- Citation
- [2025] HKCA 899
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV189/2024
The Notice of Motion was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) HKCFAO; his assertions were vague, unsupported and merely re-ran arguments already rejected by the Court of Appeal, and there was no basis to grant leave under the alternative limb of s22(1)(b).