2 Apr 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 黃耀勤
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 2660
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA283/2024
On a full rehearing of the evidence the court found that the appellant’s account showed a pattern of high‑frequency, split deposits and large cumulative receipts from an unknown principal over a short period; the appellant failed to make reasonable inquiries or safeguard against suspicious funds; applying the Harjani test a reasonable person with the appellant’s knowledge would have believed the funds were proceeds of crime; conviction and the 12‑month immediate custodial sentence were therefore upheld.