16 Mar 2026
香港特別行政區 訴 林嘉隆
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 1544
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA316/2025
Given appellant was sole owner and authorised signatory of the account, the account showed multiple large unexplained USD deposits (including from the victim) that were almost immediately withdrawn, the deposits were grossly disproportionate to appellant's income, and appellant had given account access to a third party while detained, a reasonable person in appellant's position would necessarily believe the funds were proceeds of crime; those objective facts supported conviction and the appellate court, on re‑examination, found no basis to overturn the trial judge's findings.