10 Mar 2020
HKSAR v. YAU KA MING
- Citation
- [2020] HKCA 149
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC191/2019
Leave to appeal was refused because the judge had considered the mitigation and was entitled to reject the self-consumption claim on the facts (single concealed package, particulars and summary of facts), and the 9 month enhancement for serious recidivism was within reasonable sentencing discretion; therefore no arguable error of principle or manifest excess was demonstrated.