30 Jun 1998
The Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal because the trial judge lawfully assessed all evidence and discrepancies, correctly credited PW3 as the crucial witness, and properly took into account absence of videotape and fingerprint evidence; there is no substance to impeach the verdict.
18 May 1989
Convictions were unsafe and must be set aside because the magistrate failed to record a description of the witness's demonstration leaving the scene unclear and incapable of being satisfactorily visualized on appeal, and the disorderly conduct conviction was unsupported because there was no evidence of likelihood of injury or damage.
16 Sept 1983
Despite imperfections and a lacuna in the trial record, the trial judge's findings and the overall evidence sufficiently established that the appellant was one of the attackers; the application for leave to appeal was therefore dismissed.
9 Jun 1981
The Court of Appeal held that the judge was required to consider hardship to all persons living with the tenant (including clansmen) and to weigh their proximity and income; because the judge failed to consider the clansmen's earnings and the tenant did not discharge the onus of proving manifest injustice, the appeal was allowed and an order for possession made.