25 Sept 2024
莊裕安 v. 終審法院常任大法官李義 AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 2596
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL1718/2023
All six applications were dismissed because the Applicant failed to identify any impugned administrative decision or reasonably arguable public law grounds; the applications constituted abusive collateral attacks on concluded judicial decisions outside the scope of judicial review, and the court was entitled to refuse leave and endorse the making of a Restrictive Proceedings Order to prevent further abuse.