16 Jun 2021
VITALY ORLOV v. MAGNUS LEONARD ROTH AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 1705
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1331/2017
The court exercised its discretion on the specific facts: because the valuation was inevitable given the adversarial history but the Valuation materially vindicated Orlov against Roth's lower figures and Roth's conduct contributed to contested and avoidable costs, Roth must pay 80% of Orlov's valuation costs and 80% of the Valuer's costs, Orlov to pay 20% of the Valuer's costs, and the company's (TTC) costs to be shared equally; all costs taxed if not agreed.