27 Aug 2020
TACHING PETROLEUM CO LTD v. MEYER ALUMINIUM LTD
- Citation
- [2020] HKCT 7
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Case number
- CTA1/2018
The Tribunal directed that no leave to appeal is required for the Amendment Decision under rule 44 but that leave is required for the Expert Evidence Decision as it is an interlocutory case management decision; Meyer failed to establish a reasonable prospect of success or public-interest grounds for leave; the applications for leave to appeal were dismissed and costs were to be borne by Meyer with certificates for two counsel.