27 Jul 2015
CKK v. WMYA
- Citation
- CKK v. WMYA
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC10089/2007
The court held that the disputed requests were relevant to the petitioner’s needs and standard of living and therefore disclosure must be ordered; audited company figures suffice for the identified company liability so no further sworn confirmation was necessary, but the petitioner must provide particulars and documentary support for specified expenditure items, unredacted and legible copies of the documents redacted on trade secret grounds, and credit card statements or bank letters for the last 12 months; costs were reserved.