7 Feb 1991
PETER A. DE KANTZOW AND ANOTHER v. THE APPEAL TRIBUNAL
- Citation
- PETER A. DE KANTZOW AND ANOTHER v. THE APPEAL TRIBUNAL
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP3193/1990
The refusal to hold an inquiry was quashed because the papers before the Appeal Tribunal disclosed disputed facts and a reasonable possibility of the appellants' success such that the Tribunal could not properly have excluded the possibility without an oral inquiry; the refusal was therefore beyond the Tribunal's powers and Wednesbury unreasonable, warranting certiorari and mandamus to compel an inquiry.