14 Jan 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 石數
- Citation
- [2022] HKCA 103
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC222/2020
The court held the judge did not err as the case did not require Turnbull directions because the crucial evidence was description of conduct and position (gesture by woman beside driver) rather than pure facial identification; PW3's evidence was coherent, plausible on the facts and supported by the environment and timings, and PW4's differing observations were explicable by different observation windows. The trial judge was entitled to reject the applicant's account and the leave application was refused.