2 Jun 2005
MAN FONG HANG v. MAN PING NAM AND OTHERS
- Citation
- MAN FONG HANG v. MAN PING NAM AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV104/2004
Leave to appeal was refused because the award of equitable compensation was an unliquidated claim and therefore did not fall within s22(1)(a); the issues raised under s22(1)(b) were not matters of great general or public importance as they depended on the facts and did not disclose a general question of law; aggregation with other actions did not convert the claim; accordingly the applications to amend and for leave to appeal were dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.