12 Feb 1997
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL v. SHIMIZU CORPORATION
- Citation
- THE ATTORNEY GENERAL v. SHIMIZU CORPORATION
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV81/1996
The court held the parties' procedural agreement was integral to the arbitration and did not remove the operation of the Croasdell principle; issues 3 and 4 were interlocutory and thus required leave under r2(b), and none of the issues met the high threshold of being of great general and public importance or otherwise meriting leave, so the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.