29 Oct 1996
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TAT FUNG ENTERPRISES CO. LTD.
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TAT FUNG ENTERPRISES CO. LTD.
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV139/1996
The appeals were dismissed because the appellant failed to adduce any material facts to rebut the statutory presumption created by s33(8) of the Buildings Ordinance and therefore failed to show a meritorious defence to the Building Authority's claim; mere speculation about non-annexation is insufficient to set aside a default judgment.