18 Feb 2011
FINEWAY PROPERTIES LTD v. SIN HO YUEN VICTOR, THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SIN YAT
- Citation
- FINEWAY PROPERTIES LTD v. SIN HO YUEN VICTOR, THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SIN YAT
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV95/2009
Leave to appeal was refused because the questions advanced were fact‑sensitive and did not raise issues of great general or public importance under s22(1) Cap.484; the applicant failed to properly formulate a question deserving determination by the Court of Final Appeal and proffered new arguments not previously raised, which the court would not entertain on the leave application.