9 Jun 2023
快訊科技有限公司 對 畢天慶及另一人
- Citation
- [2023] HKDC 630
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1449/2019
法院認為原告並無可接受的新證據或新證人支持上訴;所稱已找到收據正本和證人為未能證實的傳聞,並伴隨延誤及誤導,構成濫用司法程序;因此根據O.18 r.19(1)(b)及(d)維持聆案官剔除命令,上訴被駁回。
9 Jun 2023
法院認為原告並無可接受的新證據或新證人支持上訴;所稱已找到收據正本和證人為未能證實的傳聞,並伴隨延誤及誤導,構成濫用司法程序;因此根據O.18 r.19(1)(b)及(d)維持聆案官剔除命令,上訴被駁回。
3 Aug 2015
The plaintiff's claims were dismissed because they constitute re-litigation of matters already finally determined in prior proceedings, amount to a collateral attack and abuse of process, and therefore must be struck out even though some actions were commenced before the RAO/RPO.