14 Jun 2007
PAI CHIN MING AND ANOTHER v. LUO XIAO AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- PAI CHIN MING AND ANOTHER v. LUO XIAO AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2693/2006
Because substantial new evidence and a revised Statement of Claim were produced shortly before the hearing, fairness required granting the Defendants an opportunity to file evidence in response; accordingly the Recorder adjourned the hearing and allowed a 21‑day period for the Defendants to file and serve their reply evidence, reserved the costs of the hearing and ordered that costs thrown away by the adjournment be to the Defendants.