20 Jul 2009
GREAT CITY HOLDINGS LTD v. TO CHUN HUNG
- Citation
- GREAT CITY HOLDINGS LTD v. TO CHUN HUNG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA47/2009
On the available evidence and on balance of probabilities the plaintiff is likely to obtain judgment for a substantial sum because the defendant's oral tenancy case was inherently implausible, unsupported by particulars or documents and in any event unenforceable under s.3 CPO; the defendant's counterclaim was unquantified and unsupported; accordingly the court exercised its discretion to grant the interim payment sought.