7 Dec 2010
SZETO MING AND ANOTHER v. LI MAN KEE GAILEY
- Citation
- SZETO MING AND ANOTHER v. LI MAN KEE GAILEY
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1991/2008
The delay of eight days was not inordinate and the court exercised discretion to hear the application, but the appropriation of the $206,000 to the cash loan was validly made on 6 October and completed when the cheque was cashed on 11 October so a subsequent change of mind could not alter the appropriation; the defendant's factual challenges lacked merit and leave to appeal was refused.