14 May 2014
HKSAR v. LUI LAI MEI AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LUI LAI MEI AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA90/2014
The magistrate's evaluation that the accomplice witness was credible and that contemporaneous documentary and voucher evidence contradicted the appellants' account was properly reached; those findings made the convictions safe; the chosen sentences (two groups of concurrent terms ordered to run consecutively giving total 18 months) were proportionate for breach of trust; and the mandatory restitution order under section 12 for the ascertained payment was lawful and correctly quantified for the 2nd appellant.